LD 986
pg. 13
Page 12 of 77 An Act To Enact the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act Amendments of 1996 an... Page 14 of 77
Download Bill Text
LR 467
Item 1

 
determination of the controlling order in multiple order
situations.

 
In 1992 Subsection (24) introduced a completely new term,
"tribunal," which replaced the term "court" used in RURESA.
With the advent of federally-funded IV-D programs, a number of
states have delegated various aspects of child support
establishment and enforcement to quasi-judicial bodies and
administrative agencies. The term "tribunal" accounts for the
breadth of state variations in dealing with support orders. By
2001 the usage has become the standard in the child support
enforcement community, although private practitioners who only
rarely are involved in such cases may still find the term
unfamiliar.

 
Sec. 8. 19-A MRSA §2803, as enacted by PL 1995, c. 694, Pt. B, §2
and affected by Pt. E, §2, is repealed and the following
enacted in its place:

 
§2803.__Remedies cumulative

 
1.__Remedies cumulative.__Remedies provided by this chapter
are cumulative and do not affect the availability of remedies
under other law, including the recognition of a support order
of a foreign country or political subdivision on the basis of
comity.

 
2.__Not exclusive method; jurisdiction.__This chapter does
not:

 
A.__Provide the exclusive method of establishing or
enforcing a support order under the laws of this State; or

 
B.__Grant a tribunal of this State jurisdiction to render
judgment or issue an order relating to parental rights and
responsibilities other than child support in a proceeding
under this chapter.

 
Uniform Comment

 
(This is Section 104 of the Uniform Act.)

 
The existence of procedures for interstate establishment,
enforcement, or modification of support or a determination of
parentage in UIFSA does not preclude the application of the
general law of the forum. Even if the parents live in
different states, for example, a petitioner may decide to file
an original proceeding for child support (and most likely for
other relief as well) directly in the State of residence of
the respondent and proceed under that forum's generally
applicable support law. In so doing, the petitioner thereby
submits to the personal jurisdiction of the forum and foregoes
reliance on UIFSA. Once a


Page 12 of 77 Top of Page Page 14 of 77