|
recruiting of athletes should cause educational institutions to | carefully consider whether to exercise the right established by | subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection 1] in most situations. | There are, however, known instances of extremely egregious | conduct by student athletes who received lucrative professional | contracts which caused serious damage to educational | institutions. Subsection (a) [Maine cite subsection 1] keeps | open the possibility of a civil action against those | individuals. |
|
| Section 16 [Maine cite section 246] does not specifically | authorize an action by a student athlete against an athlete | agent because the student athlete can bring an action against | an athlete agent under existing law. Subsection (e) [Maine | cite subsection 5] preserves the rights of the student athlete | under existing law. |
|
| §247.__Administrative penalty |
|
| | The commissioner may assess a fine against an athlete agent | not to exceed $25,000 for a violation of this chapter. |
|
| The procedure for imposing an administrative penalty and | complying with due process requirements are left to the | adopting State's administrative procedures law. |
|
| §248.__Uniformity of application and construction |
|
| | In applying and construing this uniform Act, consideration | must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law | with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it. |
|
| §249.__Federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National |
|
| | The provisions of this chapter governing the legal effect, | validity or enforceability of electronic records or | signatures, and of contracts formed or performed with the use | of such records or signatures conform to the requirements of | the federal Electronic Signatures in Global and National | Commerce Act, Public Law 106-229, Section 102, 114 Stat. 464 | (2000) and supersede, modify and limit the federal Electronic | Signatures | in Global and National Commerce Act. |
|
|