LD 83
pg. 2
Page 1 of 2 An Act to Ban Permanent Replacement Workers in a Labor Dispute LD 83 Title Page
Download Bill Text
LR 1012
Item 1

 
Any employer who violates this subsection is subject to a civil
penalty not to exceed $10,000 for each day the violation
continues, payable to the State, to be recovered in a civil
action. Upon request, any court of competent jurisdiction shall
also enjoin the violation under section 5.

 
The Attorney General, the Commissioner of Labor or any employee,
employees or bargaining agent of employees involved in the labor
dispute may file a civil action to enforce this subsection.

 
4. Hiring off-site permitted. An employer involved in a
labor dispute, strike or lockout may perform hiring activities
prohibited under subsection 3 at any site other than his
customary plants, facilities, places of business or worksites
where a labor dispute, strike or lockout involving the employees
of that employer is in progress.

 
A. The employer must notify the law enforcement agencies of
the county and municipality in which these activities will
be conducted at least 10 days before commencing hiring
activities.

 
B. No employee of the employer conducting hiring activities
under this subsection and who is involved in the labor
dispute, strike or lockout may picket, congregate or in any
way protest the hiring activity of the employer within 200
feet of the building or structure at which such activities
are taking place. Violation of this paragraph is a Class E
crime.

 
5. Dangerous weapons prohibited. It is a Class D crime for
any person, including, but not limited to, security guards and
persons involved in a labor dispute, strike or lockout, to be
armed with a dangerous weapon, as defined in Title 17-A, section
2, subsection 9, at a site where applications for employment with
an employer involved in a labor dispute, strike or lockout are
being received or where interviews of those job applicants are
being conducted or where medical examinations of those job
applicants are being performed.

 
A. A person holding a valid permit to carry a concealed
firearm is not exempt from this subsection.

 
B. A security guard is exempt from this subsection to the
extent that federal laws or rules required the security
guard to be armed with a dangerous weapon at such a site.

 
C. A public law enforcement officer is exempt from this
subsection while on active duty in the public service.

 
D. A security guard employed by an employer involved in a
labor dispute, strike or lockout may be present at the
location where applications for employment with the employer
will be accepted, interviews of those applicants conducted
or medical examinations of those applicants performed to the
extent permitted under Title 32, chapter 93. Nothing in
this section may be construed to extend or limit in any way
the restrictions placed upon the location of private
security guards under Title 32, chapter 93.

 
Sec. 2. 26 MRSA §595-A is enacted to read:

 
§595-A.__Contracts between employers and replacement workers

 
If any business operating in this State enters into an
agreement with individuals or groups of employees by which they
are to replace lawfully striking employees who regularly perform
the majority of their work in this State, the agreement must
provide that when the strike is settled or if the striking
employees offer unconditionally to return to work, those
replacement workers will not be retained by the business in
preference to the strikers.__The replacement workers may be given
only post-strike rights that do not detract from the claims of
the striking employees to return to their previous positions.__
Any agreement, written or oral, express or implied, inconsistent
with this section is not binding to the extent that it differs
from this section.

 
SUMMARY

 
This bill repeals the provisions in current law that attempt
to restrict an employer's right to hire replacement workers
during a labor dispute. Superior Court Chief Justice Morton A.
Brody declared those provisions were preempted by the National
Labor Relations Act in 1989. The bill retains only those
provisions that relate directly to deterrence of violence during
a labor dispute.

 
The bill also requires that a contract between an employer and
replacement workers must provide that when the strike is settled
or if the employees offer unconditionally to return to work the
replacement workers will not be retained in preference to the
strikers.


Page 1 of 2 Top of Page LD 83 Title Page